Frequently Asked Questions about FGM

Update: 04/11/20

What is FGM?

Female genital mutilation (FGM) involves the partial or total removal of external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. The procedure can cause severe bleeding, infection, infertility and even death. FGM can have devastating physical, psychological and social consequences for the rest of girls’ lives.

Ultimately FGM is carried out to control women’s sexuality and sexual agency. In addition to the physical issues, FGM is also linked to child marriage and other harmful practices.

The effect that FGM has on a girl’s physical and mental health, as well as the limits it places on her sexual agency and life prospects, means that FGM is a seriously harmful practice that needs to end.

Is FGM a religious practice?”

No. FGM has nothing to do with religion.

It is often incorrectly perceived as an Islamic religious practice. However, it is entrenched in the traditions of many societies around the world and is not connected to any religion in particular. It predates Christianity and Islam.

FGM is practiced among some followers of the Muslim, Christian, and Jewish faiths. The association of FGM with Islam has been refuted by many Muslim scholars and theologians who note that FGM is not prescribed in the Quran and is contradictory to the teachings of Islam. In Ireland, The Islamic Centre of Ireland and the Irish Muslim Peace & Integration Council have strongly condemned FGM.

“Can FGM ever be prevented?”

A 2018 study by the British Medical Journal showed that the number of girls undergoing FGM has fallen dramatically in East Africa over the past two decades – from 71.4% in 1995 to 8% in 2016.

ActionAid believes that bringing an end to female genital mutilation requires changes in attitudes and behaviour at all levels of society.  In Kenya, we provide direct support to women and girls who have escaped mutilation, through our rescue centres, safe houses and girls clubs.

To bring about change we talk openly about the damaging impacts of FGM with women, men, boys and girls, as well as influential members of the community, such as traditional elders and religious leaders. We work closely with each of these groups and offer them training in the specific skills they need to speak out and influence others, so that eventually whole communities reject FGM.

Why does FGM take place?”

FGM is a cultural practice. In many instances, parents want their daughters to undergo FGM to avoid stigma and social exclusion

Families see it as part of upholding family honour and tradition. Women, particularly older generations, who are custodians and key decision makers on FGM, view it as an essential part of a girl’s cultural and gender identity, and a social obligation.

Men and boys often grow up expecting that they will marry someone who has undergone the procedure. Additionally girls may want to be cut due to peer pressure, fear of social exclusion, and the belief that is necessary if they wish to marry.

Refusing FGM can have severe social repercussions, including being rejected by one’s family, becoming an outcast, and in extreme cases — such as certain areas in Uganda – being denied the right to speak in public.

“What is the difference between male circumcision and FGM?”

Male circumcision involves the removal of the foreskin from the head of the penis and is a practice that will normally have no harmful effect on the boy being circumcised. It does, however, very often take place without the consent of the boy which goes against his right to bodily integrity. Male circumcision is sometimes required for medical reasons and in these cases, it offers medical benefits to the recipient if carried out in a medical facility.

FGM is the removal of part or all the female genital organs for no medical reason. It is also often carried out without the explicit consent of the girl being cut and is a much more harmful practice than male circumcision.

FGM is never medically required and very often has severe negative consequences for the recipient, both physical and psychological. In the short term, it can cause, excessive bleeding, shock, infection and even death. For survivors of FGM, it can also cause vaginal, menstrual and sexual health problems as well as obstetric fistula, childbirth issues and many more health problems. Not to mention the effects on the psyche, confidence levels and or psychological effects on the girl, that she will carry with her throughout her life.

“What is ActionAid doing to end FGM in Ireland?”

Our Anti-FGM project is a course based on helping people to reflect on their problems and the possible solutions. It provides women who take part with the knowledge, skills and confidence to reject FGM, for both themselves and female relatives or friends, by understanding their right to bodily autonomy.

ActionAid is part of the Irish Steering Committee on FGM, which was started in 2008. Other specialised organisations in the country such as AkiDwA and the Irish Family Planning Clinic (IFPA) are working on raising awareness and providing support and services to victims and potential victims of FGM.

In January ActionAid launched a petition to ‘End FGM by 2030.’ The petition has received over 10,000 signatures and we have been blown away by the response.

To sign the petition click here. To further your support and make a donation click here

“I thought FGM was already illegal in Ireland?

Correct. FGM became illegal in Ireland in 2012 when the Criminal Justice Act (Female Genital Mutilation) was passed.

However, the law alone is not enough to stop this practice. In fact, there is a danger that the law will drive it further underground – meaning survivors fail to receive urgent medical or psycho-social care.

ActionAid lobbies for a preventative approach with interventions aimed at challenging social norms. To do this, we are calling for a National Action Plan on FGM which supports the training of all professionals and service providers working with FGM-affected communities, including, for example, midwives and social workers. This approach means we can prevent FGM from happening in the first place rather than taking a purely punitive route.

Why wait until 2030?”

The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that more than 140 million girls and women globally have undergone this procedure – with more than 3 million girls in Africa alone at risk of undergoing this practise every year.

Unfortunately, recent studies by the United Nations Population Fund (UNPF) estimates that the Covid-19 pandemic and the significant delays in programmes to end FGM could result in an estimated 2 million additional cases of FGM over the next decade.

After much thought, we decided ending FGM by 2030 is a realistic and achievable target. Given the prevalence of FGM and its deep roots in cultural practices, we could not in good conscience say that we could end it immediately. Other organisations such as Unicef, Equality Now and The United Nations also support ending FGM by 2030 and we felt it would be more achievable if we work together.

There is a huge lack of awareness about FGM in Ireland. In addition to this, most of the women and girls who are at risk of or have undergone FGM in Ireland belong to migrant communities so they are often excluded from public services.

Communities who practice FGM often believe it is vital to maintaining ideas of cleanliness or honour for their daughters or granddaughters. Cultural beliefs like this are not easily changed which is why we have taken a multidimensional approach.

While effective, change is slow. At ActionAid, we pride ourselves on being accountable. We recognise that changing deep-rooted cultural behaviours does not happen overnight.

To clarify, this timeline does not mean we support FGM happening in the next 10 years. In fact, we abhor it in all cases. We simply want to be transparent, realistic, and accountable in our campaign to end FGM.

“What difference will a petition make?”

When you sign our petition, you are helping us to demonstrate that a large number of people care about this topic.

It works best when the number of petitioners is high. That way we can send a clear message to:

  • The Irish government: we want to show the government that people care about this issue and that it is no longer something we can ignore
  • General public: we use the petition to build awareness around FGM in Ireland. We believe that the more people know about this issue – the greater chance we have of solving it
  • Survivors of FGM: signing and sharing the petition is a powerful expression of solidarity to the survivors of FGM. When you sign and decide to join our community of donors as well, you’re helping entire communities reject FGM.

Where did you obtain your statistics?”

According to 2016 Central Statistics Office (CSO), there is an estimated 5,790 women and girls living in Ireland who have undergone FGM. In addition to this, CSO estimates that there are as many as 1,632 girls living in Ireland who are estimated to be at high risk.

The collected data included the number of women residing in Ireland from FGM-practising countries between the ages of 15 and 44, broken down by age group and country of origin. The number of women from each country and in each age group was then integrated with applicable global prevalence data from the World Health Organisation.

Census data is subject to several limitations. According to the Irish Family Planning Association (IFPA), these figures are likely to be an underestimate. This is because some individuals and groups may be hesitant to participate in the census. Furthermore, the Central Statistics Office collected this data four years ago. Recent trends of inward migration to Ireland have shown an increase in the number of women from FGM-practising countries, therefore, we would expect this number to be even higher.

Protesters holding End Fossil Fuels banner at a climate demonstration, advocating for renewable energy solutions.

Protestors at COP 28 in Dubai. Photo: Konrad Skotnicki.

Climate protest with diverse crowd holding signs about environmental action in a city square.

Belfast Climate Change March, 2019. Photo: Trócaire.

The Profit Driving the Crisis

Despite their overwhelming contribution to global emissions, fossil fuel companies continue to attract significant financial backing—driven by their enduring profitability. This is starkly illustrated by the case of ExxonMobil, the top fossil fuel investment held by asset managers based in Ireland. In 2023, ExxonMobil reported €33.63 billion ($36 billion) in profit. That is almost twice the GDP of Botswana (€18.1 billion) and nearly three times Namibia’s GDP (€11.5 billion).

Ireland plays a hugely disproportionate role in facilitating investments into fossil fuel companies like ExxonMobil. In 2023, the investments made into fossil fuel companies by investment managers based in Ireland generated an estimated 72.5 million tons of CO2e. This is more than the CO2e emissions for the entire country of Ireland—and more than ten times that generated by Sierra Leone.

The Global Human Impact

The climate crisis is here, now, and it is causing disproportionate harm in the Global South. In Bangladesh, rising sea levels and increasingly severe cyclones are displacing coastal communities, with projections indicating that 17% of the entire country could be underwater by 2050. The legally binding Paris Agreement on climate change explicitly acknowledges the importance of tackling private finance. Its three overarching goals are: keeping below 1.5C of warming; increasing adaptation and making finance flows consistent with low emissions and resilience.

This gives a clear mandate for action:  both tax reform and corporate regulation are needed to tackle financial flows, and both nationally in Ireland and at EU level, ‘polluter pays’ taxes are lacking and regulation of the financial sector remains weak and fragmented. While EU regulation exists, it is designed more to nudge investors toward more sustainable investment practices by increasing transparency and reporting levels than to enforce strict standards. And it is moving in the wrong direction: the recently passed EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive excluded investments; and now the EU Commission’s Omnibus legislative proposal threatens to undo the limited gains made on climate plans, as well as blocking future attempts for stronger action at national level.

The Risk of Inaction

Fossil fuel investment is too profitable to remain weakly regulated. If Ireland continues with its current strategy of encouraging FDI at all costs, and relying on weak EU regulation, we are headed for catastrophe. The Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change has repeatedly warned that every fraction of a degree beyond 1.5°C brings irreversible consequences: collapsed ice sheets, vanishing coral reefs, and extreme weather events that will make vast regions of the planet uninhabitable. And yet, companies are developing oil and gas fields that could push global warming beyond 2°C.

Our research found that 91% of the investments made into fossil fuel companies by investment managers based in Ireland were to companies that have plans for fossil fuel expansion like these. Ireland cannot afford inaction on this issue.

About This Research

The figures in this report regarding investment from Ireland are based on new research commissioned by ActionAid Ireland and Trócaire. In the paper, we uncover the scale of fossil fuel investment through Ireland, who the investors are, and in which fossil fuel companies they are investing.  We analyse the current regulatory framework and explain why it is inadequate—and moving in the wrong direction. And we make specific recommendations for change, which are summarised below.

Summary of Recommendations

Regulate the private financial sector
Ireland must end its outsized role as an enabler of destructive fossil fuel investment. Ireland should introduce a strong gender-responsive national human rights and environmental due diligence framework which includes the regulation of investors with respect to human rights and the environment and climate. The transposition of the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive could achieve this if downstream activities are included and the Omnibus proposal is rejected. Ireland should prohibit investments in fossil fuel expansion and require investors to implement climate transition plans consistent with a 1.5°C climate limit.

Endorse the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty
Ireland should endorse developing a Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty to curb fossil fuel expansion and commit to a fair and funded phase out of fossil fuels.

Support tax justice
Ireland should support bold and fair new global tax rules through the UN Framework Convention on Tax, should adopt all OECD BEPS measures, and should conduct an updated and comprehensive spillover analysis of its tax policy. Ireland should take coordinated action globally, at the EU level and domestically to introduce a range of new taxes to mobilise finance needed for climate justice, based on ‘polluter pays’ and social equity principles such as wealth taxes for the highest earners, climate damages tax on investors, fossil fuel production taxes and levies on aviation and shipping.

Finance a just transition
Ireland must also meet its fair share climate finance obligations under Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, and pay our ecological debt to the Global South. Ireland should support conditionality-free debt cancellation for countries on the front lines of the climate crisis, commit to a new UN Framework Convention on Sovereign Debt, moving debt negotiations from the IMF to the UN, and to a debt workout mechanism that is fully representative and fair.

Further reading