Human rights hearing on care

ActionAid Ireland and National Women’s Council recently held a Human Rights Hearing on Care, with support from the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission.

This Human Rights Hearing put central the experiences of marginalised women in Ireland. A panel of national and international experts then responded to what they heard with a view to informing constitutional change, influence policy and practice on care.

Watch back

You can watch the Hearing back here:

Part 1: Testimonies on valuing care: How do we change how care is viewed in Irish society?

Part 2: Testimonies on the economic impacts of care: How can we address economic inequality in relation to care?

Danielle Nelson, Great Care Co-Op, Shelly Gaynor independent living movement Ireland, Georgia Grogan, Doras Buí and Sarah McEntee, Doras Buí.

Why care and unpaid care is vital

Globally, and in Ireland, states have failed to recognise the social and economic value of care work (paid or not). Care is crucial to delivering human rights, and women’s rights in particular. We all both give and receive care, and that this is a deeply fulfilling and necessary human experience. Properly valuing care means having decent pay and working conditions for carers and a social welfare system to support them, gender responsive public services and better, paid family leave and accessible, affordable, quality childcare. And it means realising the human rights of disabled people of all ages, of older people, and of people with illnesses.

At the centre of economic, political and climate crises the world faces is the care work historically shouldered by women. Globally, women perform over three quarters of the unpaid care and domestic work. In Ireland, the care sector is characterised by precarious, low paid work. Domestic care workers are often migrant women of colour and face exploitation. The reliance on women to carry out most care and unpaid work has consequences for women’s economic equality.

Our economic model, which focuses on the market value of goods means that we don’t value the millions of hours of unpaid work carried out by women in the home and community, work that is unpaid but is vital to sustaining the economy and society. The continuing reliance on women to carry out the majority of care and unpaid work has consequences for women’s economic equality and creates significant vulnerabilities for women through the power and financial imbalance it creates. This is particularly significant for disabled people, lone parents and women from minority backgrounds.

The upcoming referendum on care

The Joint Oireachtas Committee on Gender Equality recommended a referendum to amend Article 41.2, the so-called “women in the home” article, to recognise the intrinsic importance of care and care work for our society. This will take place in November 2023 and is a unique opportunity to enshrine the value of care into the Constitution and will give a mandate to policy makers to promote investment in public services and social infrastructure. It would also provide for the State to take reasonable measures to support care within and outside the home.

More about the Human Rights Hearing

On the day we heard powerful and moving testimonies from:

  • Danielle Nielson, the Great Care Co-Op, a social enterprise that offers a whole-person approach to senior and elderly care;
  • Sarah McEntee Doras Bui, a parent’s alone resource centre.
  • Georgia Grogan, Family Carer and Advocate.
  • Fiona Weldon, Independent Living Movement Ireland.
  • Margaret Turley, Self-Advocate on Intellectual Disabilities.
  • Deborah Oniah, Representative from Direct Provision.

We also heard responses to testimonies by:

  • Ivana Bacik TD.
  • Huma Haq, Social Care Organiser, Public Services International, the Global Union of Federation of Workers in Public Services, who fight for the public provision of quality care services: for the benefit of those in need and the workers involved.
  • Diane Elson, economist and leading academic on care work.
  • Wangari Kinoti, Global Feminist Lead, Global Lead for Women’s Rights and Feminist Alternatives at ActionAid International, a feminist and pan Africanist who has worked in various roles in the national, regional and international women’s rights and social justice.

You can watch the entire event here: Part 1, Part 2.

Protesters holding End Fossil Fuels banner at a climate demonstration, advocating for renewable energy solutions.

Protestors at COP 28 in Dubai. Photo: Konrad Skotnicki.

Climate protest with diverse crowd holding signs about environmental action in a city square.

Belfast Climate Change March, 2019. Photo: Trócaire.

The Profit Driving the Crisis

Despite their overwhelming contribution to global emissions, fossil fuel companies continue to attract significant financial backing—driven by their enduring profitability. This is starkly illustrated by the case of ExxonMobil, the top fossil fuel investment held by asset managers based in Ireland. In 2023, ExxonMobil reported €33.63 billion ($36 billion) in profit. That is almost twice the GDP of Botswana (€18.1 billion) and nearly three times Namibia’s GDP (€11.5 billion).

Ireland plays a hugely disproportionate role in facilitating investments into fossil fuel companies like ExxonMobil. In 2023, the investments made into fossil fuel companies by investment managers based in Ireland generated an estimated 72.5 million tons of CO2e. This is more than the CO2e emissions for the entire country of Ireland—and more than ten times that generated by Sierra Leone.

The Global Human Impact

The climate crisis is here, now, and it is causing disproportionate harm in the Global South. In Bangladesh, rising sea levels and increasingly severe cyclones are displacing coastal communities, with projections indicating that 17% of the entire country could be underwater by 2050. The legally binding Paris Agreement on climate change explicitly acknowledges the importance of tackling private finance. Its three overarching goals are: keeping below 1.5C of warming; increasing adaptation and making finance flows consistent with low emissions and resilience.

This gives a clear mandate for action:  both tax reform and corporate regulation are needed to tackle financial flows, and both nationally in Ireland and at EU level, ‘polluter pays’ taxes are lacking and regulation of the financial sector remains weak and fragmented. While EU regulation exists, it is designed more to nudge investors toward more sustainable investment practices by increasing transparency and reporting levels than to enforce strict standards. And it is moving in the wrong direction: the recently passed EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive excluded investments; and now the EU Commission’s Omnibus legislative proposal threatens to undo the limited gains made on climate plans, as well as blocking future attempts for stronger action at national level.

The Risk of Inaction

Fossil fuel investment is too profitable to remain weakly regulated. If Ireland continues with its current strategy of encouraging FDI at all costs, and relying on weak EU regulation, we are headed for catastrophe. The Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change has repeatedly warned that every fraction of a degree beyond 1.5°C brings irreversible consequences: collapsed ice sheets, vanishing coral reefs, and extreme weather events that will make vast regions of the planet uninhabitable. And yet, companies are developing oil and gas fields that could push global warming beyond 2°C.

Our research found that 91% of the investments made into fossil fuel companies by investment managers based in Ireland were to companies that have plans for fossil fuel expansion like these. Ireland cannot afford inaction on this issue.

About This Research

The figures in this report regarding investment from Ireland are based on new research commissioned by ActionAid Ireland and Trócaire. In the paper, we uncover the scale of fossil fuel investment through Ireland, who the investors are, and in which fossil fuel companies they are investing.  We analyse the current regulatory framework and explain why it is inadequate—and moving in the wrong direction. And we make specific recommendations for change, which are summarised below.

Summary of Recommendations

Regulate the private financial sector
Ireland must end its outsized role as an enabler of destructive fossil fuel investment. Ireland should introduce a strong gender-responsive national human rights and environmental due diligence framework which includes the regulation of investors with respect to human rights and the environment and climate. The transposition of the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive could achieve this if downstream activities are included and the Omnibus proposal is rejected. Ireland should prohibit investments in fossil fuel expansion and require investors to implement climate transition plans consistent with a 1.5°C climate limit.

Endorse the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty
Ireland should endorse developing a Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty to curb fossil fuel expansion and commit to a fair and funded phase out of fossil fuels.

Support tax justice
Ireland should support bold and fair new global tax rules through the UN Framework Convention on Tax, should adopt all OECD BEPS measures, and should conduct an updated and comprehensive spillover analysis of its tax policy. Ireland should take coordinated action globally, at the EU level and domestically to introduce a range of new taxes to mobilise finance needed for climate justice, based on ‘polluter pays’ and social equity principles such as wealth taxes for the highest earners, climate damages tax on investors, fossil fuel production taxes and levies on aviation and shipping.

Finance a just transition
Ireland must also meet its fair share climate finance obligations under Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, and pay our ecological debt to the Global South. Ireland should support conditionality-free debt cancellation for countries on the front lines of the climate crisis, commit to a new UN Framework Convention on Sovereign Debt, moving debt negotiations from the IMF to the UN, and to a debt workout mechanism that is fully representative and fair.

Further reading